By Sen. Abdul Aziz Nyako
Today I watched a video of police running from the people that they ought to be protecting because the people had turned against their malpractices. That was a disaster in itself. It should not have been allowed to get to this level but that is a matter for another day.
I have observed how the #EndSARS Protest is gradually spiralling out of control. I have also read and heard many views on the situation. No doubt, the situation is very delicate indeed. It is important therefore that we all calm down and think deeply.
It is important to study even briefly what happened in France in the 1700s that led to the French Revolution and the collapse of the Monarchy and the establishment of the Republic.
[The immediate cause of the revolution was the near collapse of the French budget. Although the economy had been expanding for 50 years, there were periodic crises. Bad harvests in 1787 and 1788 and a slowdown in manufacturing led to food shortages, rising prices for food, and unemployment.] Google.
It was a simple tea tax by the British that ignited the American War of Independence in the late 1700s.
[The initial grievances of the American Revolution were the taxation (tea tax inclusive) and imposition of housing British soldiers on the American colonies by the British Parliament. These measures were taken largely in order to recoup the tremendous price the British Parliament had paid in fighting the French and Indian War.] Google.
It was poor Governance and the loss of a war that led to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
[The immediate causes of the revolution were military defeat in the Russo-Japanese War and the well-known massacre, known as Bloody Sunday. These causes led to a continuous amount of discontent and people in Russia began to protest about how they wanted their country to run.]
All this had started as simple protests by the people but the situations were poorly handled by their governments. Consequently, these protests became popular uprisings that overthrew governments and changed world history.
What was common to all those cases was that their governments had responded in a high handed manner particularly by introducing the military into the matter and the situation spiralled out of control.
[When you fight a person with your fist, he is likely to retaliate with a fist, but when you pick a weapon, he is likely to pick up a weapon too thus escalating the situation].
It therefore means that an overall strategy of de-escalation must be adopted by all arms and tiers of Government. This must be heard in words and seen in deeds. It must also be well coordinated.
The military should be kept completely out of this matter. Government must find a way of de-escalating the situation at all cost.
Nobody (no matter how aggrieved, no matter the ethno-religious sentiment, no matter the political bias, no matter how hardline) should advocate in any way for an escalation by the Government especially through the use of the military.
Were the Military to fail, that would be the end of civility and the beginning of anarchy!
There is also a need for the protesters to de-escalate.
One might know how a crisis started but one might not be able to predict its outcome. Anything could happen!
Many a revolutionary was consumed by the very flame that he/she had started. “Ask” Trotsky, a close ally of Lenin and Stalin who fled to Mexico on self exile to protect himself only to be pursued there and assassinated by his close associates. He was ultimately consumed by the very flame of revolution that he had started.
This was also the case of many of the participants in the French Revolution. The process was hijacked and many of the very people that started it as innocent protesters or moral supporters were branded enemies of the state and guillotined! [ Did you know? Over 17,000 people were officially tried and executed during the Reign of Terror, and an unknown number of others died in prison or without trial.] Google.
Same thing in China. Same thing in Cambodia. Many innocent people were killed!
Read Animal Farm by George Orwell for a better perspective!
It is therefore important for all sides to take a step back and de-escalate.
May the Almighty grant us a solution to this mayhem. May we also act rightly! Amin.
Abdulaziz Nyako was the immediate past senator representing Adamawa central
My husband and I agreed that another man impregnated me ’cos he has low sperm count —Wife
A woman, Toyin Dotun, has appealed to Ile Tuntun Customary Court, Mapo, Ibadan, Oyo State, to dissolve her 11-year-old marriage to her husband, Bello Dotun, on the grounds of irreconcilable differences.
Toyin stated that her relationship with her husband was devoid of intimacy.
The plaintiff explained that she was tired of covering up for her husband and pretending that all was well.
She thus pleaded that their wedlock be ended.
Bello however insisted that their union should not be dissolved.
According to him, Toyin is God-sent and his destiny helper.
Toyin in her evidence explained, “I have endured this long in our marriage because I didn’t want the world to know that things were not going on fine between us.
“I have covered up enough and it is taking its toll on my health which is one of the reasons I came to court.
“My husband and I are just living together under the same roof but there is no relationship or intimacy between us.
“Bello carries out no responsibility towards me as his wife, but has rather been using me to meet his needs.
“I built and moved into my house 10 years ago and my husband moved in with me. My husband and I have never had sex since then.
“We lost the only child in the union at age six and I requested that we had another. To my chagrin, my husband refused that we had sex. He stated that his doctor advised him to abstain from sex because he was on treatment.
“I didn’t understand this nor believed him, but I later came across the result of a test which read that he had low sperm count.
“I sought the help of some medical doctors and they fixed appointments with my husband at different times but he refused to honour these appointments.
“We both agreed that I had an affair with another man who would impregnate me. Our plan was to raise the child as that of my husband and cover up for his inadequacy.
“My lord, my husband failed to show me and our child any love or affection while he is in the habit of disgracing and humiliating me in the public.
“Any time we had a disagreement, he would threaten to take the child away from me.
“My lord, I’m fed up with our relationship. I pray that you separate us, “the plaintiff said.
Bello giving his testimony said, “My lord, I refuse that our marriage be dissolved. My wife is God-sent. She is my destiny helper
“Our marriage is blessed with two children, but we lost one.
“It is true that the doctor told me I have low sperm count, but she never told me our child is not mine.
“Toyin lied that I refused to have sex with her. She is in the habit of closing her door against me. She accused me of wanting to have sex with her through diabolic means when I once forced myself into her room.
“Toyin and I both take care of this child while I do that which is within my capacity in fending for the home. But to be sincere, my wife bears the brunt the responsibility.
“My wife and other family members prevailed on me to move in with her in her house, it was never in my plan,” he concluded.
Giving his judgment, the court president, Chief Olasunkanmi Agbaje stated that more evidence was needed.
Change of guards and expectations, By A.A. Gadzama
A city has fallen: Professor Dahiru Yahya By Kabiru Ibrahim Danguguwa
By Kabiru Ibrahim Danguguwa
“The Mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires”. William Arthur Ward.
Professor Dahiru Yahya was one of my favourite teachers and remains a good mentor to this day. In Professor Dahiru Yahya, true scholarship and humility meet.
A generous, charismatic and prolific thinker. I first met him at Bayero University, Kano when I was an undergraduate student in the Department of History. Since that time, Prof as he once said, enjoyed every moment he spent with me.
He believed that young people always have novel ideas and be updated; he would always listen to me as if I was his teacher.
He used to call young people his teachers whenever they told him something new. In one of the moments I spent with him, Prof. told me that ahead (brain) of a professor is just like a city. He, therefore, advised me to value every moment spent with Professors by exploring the city.
During my MSc degree between 2012-2014, Prof was so keen to read my thesis when I informed him that I was writing on Boko Haram and AQIM.
He helped me with whatever I needed to complete the thesis. A year later, I informed him that I was presenting part of the work in a Faculty seminar. He was so happy and promised to come all the way from Abuja to listen to my presentation. After the presentation, he ushered in intellectual discussions on the origin of ‘Islamic activism’. He even responded to the questions I was supposed to answer. What a great honour!
As a humble person, Prof allowed me to explore his city as much as I could. I wanted to explore more when I informed one of my course mates that I wanted to see Prof to discuss the situation of the country last week. He deliberately shared some of his life encounters with people I considered great men in Nigeria. I have a lot to say on this. Perhaps this is not the right place.
In 2014, Prof and I were having dinner in his sitting room. His wife served us with a variety of foods. After a few minutes, Prof looked at me and said “Danguguwa! You have a masters degree but you have zero experience regarding what women can do” I was single without even a fiancé. He taught me what he jokingly called “makircin mata” .
He advised me not to underestimate the power of a woman. He said “your wife’s money is hers, while your money is for hers. Make sure you take good care of her”
When one of my course mates wanted him to write a reference letter for him, Prof gave him his letterhead and directed him to meet me. I wrote whatever I thought was right and Prof signed the letter without a second thought. In 2019 during a conference organised by Faculty of Humanities, Yusuf Maitama Sule University Kano, Prof served as a lead paper presenter.
The thought-provoking paper was sent to me for review prior to the presentation. I was confused for I couldn’t even comprehend the content of the paper. How could I review what Prof wrote? He was not happy though.
Prof joined academics almost two decades before I was born. In 2010 Bayero University Kano organised a Festschrift conference in his honour. By that time, he spent four decades teaching in the University. Out of more than seven and a half decades he spent on earth, over half a century was dedicated to teaching, research and mentorship.
Hundreds of students and colleagues attended his funeral today. Hundreds of tributes will be written in honour of the diplomatic and intellectual historian. This six hundred and forty-one words tribute says nothing about Prof Dahiru Yahya.
Allah Ya sa Aljanna ce makoma.
Kabiru Ibrahim Danguguwa, a historian and lecturer with Yusuf Maitama Sule University Kano, writes from, Kano.